Vladimir Putin recently made comments on the seriousness of global conflicts that can lead to nuclear conflict. Patriots worldwide should pay close attention as the globalists build their dangerous nuclear arsenal.
In stark contrast to attempts in numerous western countries to stifle free speech online, Russian President Vladimir Putin defended Internet freedom during a conference...
A prominent Swedish lawmaker asserts that Hungarian billionaire George Soros's influence on European politics and policies make him "one of the most dangerous men,"
Leftists Demand Japan “Embrace Multiculturalism” Because a Mixed Race Player Won the US Open
Daily Beast writer wants ‘xenophobic’ country with low immigration & low crime to open its borders
Leftists have begun demanding
that Japan, a country with low levels of immigration and a low crime
rate, begin accepting “multiculturalism” after a half-Japanese tennis
player with a Haitian-American father won the US Open.
Naomi Osaka became the first Japanese
tennis player to win a Grand Slam singles tournament when she defeated
Serena Williams in the final in New York City last weekend.
The fact that her win was greeted
enthusiastically by some in Japan and that Osaka is mixed race provided
leftists with an immediate excuse to insist that Japan open its borders
to mass immigration.
In an article entitled Japan Needs ‘Foreigner Blood’ Like Naomi Osaka’s,
the Daily Beast’s Jake Adelstein acknowledges that limited immigration,
ethnically homogenous Japan has a low crime rate and that shootings
remain in the single digits every year, but claims this is due to strong
policing and gun control laws.
Asserting that “xenophobia runs deep”
in Japan, Adelstein urges the country to “create the multiracial society
it needs to survive and thrive as a nation” due to its declining birth
rates, adding that the fact Osaka can barely speak Japanese shouldn’t be
an issue.
“With a dwindling population but a
slightly increasing number of international marriages, Japan has to
decide how to combat racism, embrace multiculturalism and tolerance if
it wants to survive,” he concludes, drawing attention to a UN migration
plan that suggests in order to keep the size of the working-age
population constant, Japan “would need 33.5 million immigrants from 1995
through 2050.”
Noticeably absent from Adelstein’s
argument is the fact that the vast majority of immigrants do not go on
to become star athletes. In reality, in most European countries that
have opened their borders to mass immigration, migrants go on welfare
and are significantly overrepresented in crime statistics.
Two example stand out. In Sweden,
which has suffered a rise in sexual assaults, grenade attacks and other
forms of violent crime since accepting a new wave of “refugees” in 2015,
58% of welfare payments go to migrants despite them making up 16% of the population.
Meanwhile, in Germany, which has seen
recent protests against mass immigration, violent crime has risen over
the last two years and 90% of it is due to migrants, according to the
German government’s own statistics.
The Japanese population itself is also
largely hostile to mass immigration, a view validated by the fact that
despite accepting extremely few Muslim refugees, two of them were arrested in the suspected gang rape of a woman in Tokyo in 2016.
A recent poll
of big and midsized firms found that only 38% favor allowing in
unskilled migrants despite Japan’s population decrease and the
opportunity to import cheap labor.
The number of foreigners living in
Japan has doubled in the past decade to 1.3 million, but that remains
below 2% of the work force.
As is documented in the video below,
not a million miles away in South Korea, well over 500,000 people
recently signed a petition saying they reject all Muslim immigration
into their country. Protesters took to the streets carrying signs that
said, “don’t be like Europe.”
Infowars has been banned by Facebook. Please help by sharing this article on your own Facebook page.
The spree of urban terrorism that's exploded in the
US over the past week wasn't a spontaneous outburst of unrest but part
of the decades-long Hybrid War of Terror on America that finally turned
kinetic in the run-up to Trump's possible re-election, and an analysis
of the origins and gradual development of this conflict could provide a
clearer picture of the course that it might take in the coming months.
A Review Of Recent Events
Subversive
forces inside the US are waging a Hybrid War of Terror on America, one
that's been decades in the making but finally turned kinetic in the
run-up to Trump's prospective re-election. For those readers who aren't
familiar with the author's earlier work on this topic, they're requested
to read or at least skim through the following articles in order to
obtain an understanding of his interpretation of contemporary events
that will frame the present analysis about their origins and their
prospective development across the course of this year:
To
oversimplify, domestic terrorist groups led on the ground primarily by
the largely decentralized Antifa network are doing everything they can
to encourage angry African-Americans to carry out a nationwide crime
wave together with acts of urban terrorism so as to increase the
likelihood of them getting killed en masse by the police, National
Guard, and/or military as the next step in provoking a "race race", the
resultant chaos of which could then be exploited to advance their
ideological agenda of "revolution".
Education Or Indoctrination?
What's
happening in America today took decades to get to this point since
ordinary Americans wouldn't otherwise react the way that many of them
regrettably are unless they were truly enraged at something so intensely
to put others' lives and their own in danger through wanton acts of
urban terrorism. Their worldview wasn't shaped in a day, but over
decades, and that initially began in the educational system which was
gradually subverted by left-wing radicals to the point where almost all college professors today
identify with this ideology or one of its variants. They indoctrinated
several generations of Americans "across the color spectrum" into
believing that their country is a "racist dictatorship" profiting off of
"economic injustice". There's definitely some truth to the general
point that America is imperfect like all countries are, with its own
particular systemic challenges that have made life difficult for some
categories of folks more so in the past than in the present day, but
that truth has been manipulated in order to radicalize the population
according to certain triggers that most directly affect each identity
demographic (e.g. racism and the criminal justice system for
African-Americans, "reverse-racism" for Caucasians, feminism for women,
corruption for the vast majority of the people, etc.).
Trotskyist Terror
This
observation makes it relevant to discuss the influence of Trotskyist
thought, which in this context simply refers to the concept of a
so-called "permanent revolution".
There's nothing wrong with the idea of continual improvement, but it's
been exploited by radical left-wing ideologies in order to promote the
Machiavellian mantra that "the ends justify the means". That said end is
what its adherents truly believe (whether on their own or due to mental
manipulation by "vanguard" elements of "the movement") to be a "better
world" for everyone, hence why they think that morality has no place
when it comes to means. Thus, even acts of urban terrorism and the
tricking of "useful idiots" into being slaughtered are "acceptable".
"The movement" does everything in its power to ensure that "the cause"
is always on everyone's minds so that nobody ever forgets about it but
is instead always incited into becoming ever more radicalized so that
their anger can then be "constructively" (or rather, destructively)
channeled in the direction of their greater goal. Saul Alinsky's "Rules For Radicals",
which he dedicated to "the first radical" Lucifer (Satan) in order to
emphasize the amorality of his Machiavellian methods, provides perfect
insight into the typical "revolutionary's" mindset.
Relativism & Deconstructivism
One
of the ways through which the educational establishment has
indoctrinated Americans has been to have them relativize and deconstruct
their society, though not in a purely objective manner (if one can even
be applied in theory), but along the lines of whatever will portray
"the movement's" "cause" as "good/legitimate" and the existing
system/establishment/everything else as "bad/illegitimate". That's not
to say that relativism and deconstructivism aren't useful to practice,
but just to point out that they're one of the more popular means through
which generations have been manipulated, with the effects cumulatively
building to the point where each generation becomes more radicalized
than their predecessors. This is made possible not only by the
"perfecting" of such "perception management" techniques, but also by
indoctrinated parents forcing their children to believe the same things
that they do, thus giving them an "ideological boost" from an early age
that they themselves didn't have and which could make them radicalize
faster and more intensely than they ever did. Convinced of the validity
of their worldview and the supposed "necessity" of "revolution", these
mass-produced "foot soldiers" then demand maximalist outcomes and
unconditional surrenders.
"The Long March Through The Institutions"
The next factor to focus on is the concept of "the long march through the institutions"
which seeks to embed "revolutionaries" and their "fellow travelers"
(ideological sympathizers who might not be as radicalized as the
first-mentioned) into various institutions beyond just the educational
one. In practice, this most often takes the form of embedding them in
influential places like the church, the media, and "Big Tech", to say
nothing of all levels of government: local/state/federal and
executive/legislative/judicial. The purpose is to slowly take control of
the state and society without arousing too much suspicion, but as the
infiltration begins to succeed, certain signs become visible once these
individuals feel comfortable enough in their positions to start actively
shaping the country through relevant policies. This also sometimes
takes the form of "politically flamboyant" personalities becoming
popular in society for their outspoken views such as Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez and the rest of "the squad" alongside their "fellow
travelers" in "Big Tech" like Twitter's Jack Dorsey among others for
example. The end result is that society realizes that influential people
harbor what had previously (and rightly) been considered to be radical
ideologies, which contributes to gradually changing the national
culture.
Gramsci's "Cultural Hegemony"
Interwar Italian Marxist theorist Antonio Gramsci is credited with pioneering the concept of "cultural hegemony"
whereby he basically asserted that "revolutions" can increase their
chance of success by capturing the national culture through various
means. Nowadays this is seen not only in the public faces of some people
who have completed "the long march through the institutions"
(especially in the media), but also especially among celebrities. The
outcome is that a certain so-called "political correctness" creeps in
which pressures individuals to censor themselves from expressing any
beliefs that don't conform with what's wrongly presented to be the
"majority consensus" even though it's more often than not still only the
view of the radical but influential minority. This doesn't always
relate to the purely economic foundations of leftism either but
increasingly takes the form of what critics have described as "Cultural Marxism",
or the attempted application of leftism's common denominator of
"equality" into the cultural sphere, which purely economic leftists
decry as ideological heresy that discredits their ideas. Consequently,
they refuse to associate with that term and those that use it despite
many "Cultural Marxists" proudly espousing leftist economic views as
well.
"Ideological Subversion"
In parallel with these previously mentioned processes is what KGB defector Yuri Bezmenov described during a 1985 interview
as "ideological subversion". It's unimportant that he attributed this
strategy to the USSR (whether rightly or wrongly) since it can be
applied by any ideologically motivated network irrespective of
partisanship that doesn't necessarily have to be state-backed. The four
phases of "ideological subversion" are demoralization (making the
majority skeptical of the status quo and feeling seemingly powerless to
resist the "revolutionaries"), destabilization (a series of incidents
that radicalize people and precondition the population to expect a
crisis), crisis (the "trigger event" for catalyzing the most active and
usually violent part of the campaign), and normalization ("the new
normal" once the "revolutionaries" seize complete power even if they
don't officially proclaim victory in the event that they succeeded in
secret). As everything that's been discussed thus far in the analysis
unfolds, the "Overton Window"
shifts whereby what was previously considered radical is now seen as
"normal" and the "old normal" becomes the "new radical" that's then
presented by the "drivers of change" as the "dangerous fringe" that
society must continue moving away from.
From Destabilization To Crisis
The
phased transition from destabilization to crisis is facilitated by
structural preconditioning such as the deliberate mental and economic
hardships brought about by the Democrat Governors' decisions to impose
strict COVID-19 lockdowns and the propagandizing of provocative
narratives throughout society via the media such as the viral videos of
police brutality against African-Americans. The first-mentioned makes
the population more desperate and therefore increasingly likely to
directly participate in the physical manifestation of the "revolution"
even if they were previously having second doubts and preferred to only
be "fellow travelers" (passive supporters). The second, meanwhile,
incites the "revolutionary vanguard" (the role of which some
participants such as criminally inclined African-Americans today aren't
even conscious that they're playing) into a rage that triggers their
prior amoral programming by reminding them that "the ends justify the
means" even if it's only to opportunistically take advantage of the
forthcoming crisis for selfish reasons like looting. Taken together,
this further the "conscious vanguard's" cause of chaos that'll enter
into effect upon the commencement of the crisis.
Color Revolution Chaos
The
ongoing kinetic phase of the Hybrid War of Terror on America couldn't
have been possible had it not been for the uncontrollable proliferation
of the same Color Revolution tactics and strategies that the US
government invented over nearly the past two decades then subsequently
spread across the internet. It was therefore only a matter of time
before "revolutionaries" at home began to apply the same methods against
the US government itself in a completely expected twist of fate. The
author's work from half a decade ago about "The Color Revolution Model: An Exposé Of The Core Mechanics" explains these processes at length, while his book from around the same time about "Hybrid Wars: The Indirect Adaptive Approach To Regime Change"
explains the phased transition from Color Revolutions (weaponized
protests) to Unconventional Wars (terrorism). In short, the terrorist
phase begins to emerge after the security services' reaction to violent
protests is caught on camera but deceptively decontextualized and
misportrayed. The edited footage is then propagated throughout society
to escalate the self-sustaining cycle of unrest by delegitimizing the
said security services and their government, which further radicalizes
the population into passively or actively supporting terrorism.
Strategic Escalations
The
kinetic (physical, violent) phase of the decades-long Hybrid War of
Terror on America is greatly aided by the "fellow travelers" who
completed their "long march through the institutions" of government,
specifically the Democrats in charge of local municipalities and various
states. Many of them refuse to order the police and National Guard
respectively to properly respond to the Color Revolution for two primary
reasons. The first is to radicalize the majority of the population
that's against this destruction so as to precondition them into
expecting a "race war", while the second is to then reinforce the
perception of Trump as a "fascist dictator" to the already radicalized
"revolutionaries" and their "fellow travelers" once he's forced to take
control of the National Guard and/or dispatch the military with the
authority to use lethal force at their discretion to quell the unrest.
That seemingly inevitable development will lead to the previously
described decontextualization of such a response through edited footage
that would become more "credible" to many if the "fellow traveling"
peaceful protesters voluntarily use themselves as "human shields" to
protect the urban terrorists among them, thus sacrificing themselves for
"the cause" as "martyrs" whose deaths will be blamed on Trump
personally.
Insubordination & Defection
"The
long march through the institutions" also seeks to infiltrate the
security services even though they're typically the most resilient, but
the "sleeper cells" among them and their media allies can attempt to get
their "moderate" colleagues to seriously consider refusing to fulfill
their professional duty to restore law and order, especially if they're
pressured not to "kill their own people" (an oft-abused phrase regularly
employed by the US government to delegitimize those foreign governments
targeted by its history of Hybrid Wars and which lethally respond to
these external provocations in self-defense). "Dog whistles" are already
being blown in this respect by former Defense Secretary Mattis and Espers
the incumbent one who have both contradicted the President to different
degrees regarding his plans to reestablish law and order. This
increases the likelihood that the aforesaid "sleeper cells" can deploy
other bespoke information warfare narratives against their "fellow"
members of the security services such as imploring them to "obey the
Constitution and not the fascist dictator who's ordering the illegal use
of force against peaceful protesters out of self-interested political
desperation to prevent his inevitable toppling by the people". If
successful, then the result this devious information warfare operation
could be game-changing.
Electoral Context
It's
impossible to ignore the fact that the ongoing Hybrid War of Terror on
America is occurring in the run-up to the November elections. The
Minneapolis "trigger event" (which might be one of many up the seemingly
never-ending escalation ladder) wasn't planned but something of the
sort might have been had that not happened in order to catalyze the
current chaos. The timing is extremely strategic because it's intended
to totally destabilize the country ahead of its pivotal vote that might
prospectively hand Trump his final term, after which he'd be completely
"unchained" without any future electoral considerations whatsoever to
pursue his own promised "revolutionary" agenda that threatens to reverse
the leftists' "march through the institution" ("draining the
swamp"/"fighting the deep state") in as radical of a manner as he'd
want. To stop him, they hope to "hack" the election by exploiting this
chaos to convince more people to vote Democrat, but as an "insurance
policy", they also plan to use mail-in ballots in order to steal the
election. Should they fail to do that and he's not overthrown beforehand
in a military coup, then they'll likely intensify their Hybrid War on
the basis that he supposedly "stole the election" following the
narrative that the US itself used against so many targets abroad over
the years.
Global Importance
The
whole world is watching what happens because of the global importance
that the outcome of this conflict will undoubtedly have. It shouldn't be
forgotten that it's occurring in the midst of what the author
previously described as World War C, which refers to the full-spectrum
paradigm-changing processes unfolding as a result of every government's
response to the COVID-19 global pandemic that readers can learn more
about here, here, and here. In accordance with the precepts of Stephen Mann's "Chaos Theory And Strategic Thought",
the initial conditions at the onset of any complex process will
disproportionately influence their outcome ("the butterfly effect"), so
even Trump's possible victory might only be a Pyrrhic one when it comes
to America's global standing in the emerging Multipolar World Order
depending on how much damage is done domestically during the course of
this conflict. Another point to keep in mind is that he's also the
leader of the worldwide nationalist/anti-globalism movement so the onset
of the kinetic phase of this Hybrid War sends a strong message to other
like-minded leaders that something similar could also happen to them at
any time too unless they were more successful than the US was in
stopping "the long march through the institutions".
Concluding Thoughts
The
ongoing phase of the Hybrid War of Terror on America can be
conceptualized as the explosion of a long-ticking time bomb similar in
effect to what happened a generation ago in the USSR after US-backed
nationalist "revolutionaries" there succeeded in destroying it from
within using almost identical means. This observation speaks to the fact
that such methods aren't exclusive to any given ideology but vary
depending upon the targeted state's unique socio-economic and political
characteristics, which could in the future be more easily identified and
tracked using the strategic insight obtained by "Big Data" operations
such as the one that Cambridge Analytica was notoriously accused of.
Considering
that this is a conflict that was decades in the making, it won't be
resolved anytime soon, especially since the "revolutionary" side is
convinced that "the ends justify the means", which makes the use of
terrorism against their "fellow" Americans "acceptable" to them.
Although every government in the world officially condemns this method
of warfare which doesn't have any ideology, race, religion, nationality,
or borders, many of them and their compatriots are more than happy to
watch the havoc that this Hybrid War will wreak for purely ideological
reasons pertaining to their hatred for the American government
(irrespective of whether or not that hatred is justified) even though
the majority of victims will likely be innocent people of all "colors".
This
hypocritical position is explained by the fact that those abroad sense
that this conflict is an "historical opportunity" to knock the US "out
of the game" once and for all, and by none other than its own Hybrid War
means that it so eagerly used to employ against almost everyone else in
one way or another. For this self-interested reason, they might even
intensify their information warfare against the US in order to embolden
the "revolutionaries" and "demoralize" the average American that's
against this reign of terror by trying to convince them
that they "deserve" all of this because they pay taxes to "fund the
evil empire" for what it does overseas in their name without their
knowledge or permission. Some of these average Americans will almost
certainly submit, but tens of millions of others probably won't go down
without a fight, even if it's to the death.
Hungary’s National Assembly has passed a law that bans showing children under the age of 18 material related to homosexuality or transgenderism in education, on television, movies or in advertisements.
The vote passed earlier today by a huge margin of 157-1.
“The law was included in a larger bill cracking down on pedophilia by creating a register of child sex offenders, implementing stricter punishments for child pornography, and barring pedophile offenders from jobs where they would encounter children. It also singled out the promotion of LGBT affairs in schools,” reports RT.
According to a statement by ruling party Fidesz, the law ensures that sex education in schools “must not be aimed” at “promoting homosexuality” or “changing gender.”
Television shows, movies and advertisement are all also banned from showing any content deemed to be promoting homosexuality or transgenderism.
After left-wing lobby groups opposed the law, protesters took to the streets of Budapest to demonstrate against the law.
However, their sentiments are not shared by the population, which voted overwhelmingly for right-wing Fidesz when the party was re-elected in 2018.
Hungary is one of few European countries that actively tries to protect its family-oriented and Christian heritage by moving to stop children being exposed to harmful information and lifestyles.
The country’s populist Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has cultivated support for his efforts to defend the sanctity of the family in the face of rampant progressivism in other European countries.
Last December, Hungary passed a constitutional amendment affirming the right of children to identify with their birth gender and defining marriage as between a man and a woman.
Asserting that Europe’s native population decline represented a “sickness,” Orbán alsooversaw a programto offer significant financial incentives for the country’s own native citizens to have children, handing out €30,600 loans to married couples who have three or more children which are completely forgiven after the birth of the third child.
While major institutions in the United Kingdom and U.S. embassies all over the world now fly the LGBT flag above their buildings, a rainbow-colored statue erected in Budapest by leftist activists in honor of Black Lives Matter was demolished within 24 hours.
Last week, Orbán alsodefendedHungarian football fans who booed Irish players ‘taking a knee’ for BLM, asserting that the gesture was a “provocation” based on white guilt over slavery and that Hungary would not be partaking in the virtue signalling act.
The unknown that lays ahead for
all of us is both exhilarating and scary. Exhilarating in the long term,
but rather scary in the short term. All empires eventually die and
we’re in the terminal phase of the New World Order that will not recover
from the Russian roulette game it has been playing, for Vladimir Putin
handed it a loaded gun and it pulled the trigger.
The last few weeks put everything
in place for the last battle. There are so many different facts and
events, left and right, and I will try to do my best to remain
methodical in this complicated expose. Bare with me, I’ve been
struggling for three weeks with this article because of the insane
amount of additional details that each day provides. It might have been a
wrong time to quit smoking, but I enjoy a good challenge.
Dropping dollars
A little context is required. The
New World Order concept is simply the wish of a handful of international
bankers that want to economically and politically rule the whole planet
as one happy family. It started in 1773 and if it went through
important changes over the years, but the concept and objective haven’t
changed an iota. Unfortunately for them, international banks that have
been looting the planet through the US dollar since 1944 are now
threatened by hyperinflation, as their printing machine has been
rotating for years to cover their absurd spendings to sustain oil and
resource wars that they’ve all ultimately lost. In order to prevent this
upcoming hyperinflation, they generated a virus attack on four
countries (China, Iran, Italy and now the United States) to spread panic
in the population, with the precious help of their ignominious medias.
Even though this corona virus isn’t different from any new viruses that
attack humans every year, the media scare pushed people to voluntarily
isolate themselves through fear and terror. Some lost their jobs,
companies are going bankrupt, the panic created a stock exchange crash
that emptied wallets and dried assets, resulting in a few trillion
virtual dollars off the market to release pressure off the currency.
So far, so good, but everything
else went wrong in this desperate and ultimate banzai. The top
virologist on the planet confirmed that chloroquine was being used by
the Chinese with spectacular results to cure patients, then he improved
his magic potion by adding a pneumonic antibacterial called
azythromicin, and saved everyone of his first 1000 cases, but one.
Donald Trump immediately imposed the same treatment through a fight
against his own Federal Drug Administration, bought and owned by the
deep state. This forced all medias to talk about Dr Didier Raoult’s
Miracle Elixir, signing the death warrant on our confidence in all
Western governments, their medical agencies, the World Health
Organization, and medias that were trying to destroy the impeccable
doctor’s reputation, while inventing sudden «dangerous side effects» of a
nearly inoffensive drug that has been used for 60 years to treat
malaria. Not so far away in Germany, internationally praised Dr Wolfgand
Wodarg noted that the engineered panic was totally useless, since this
virus isn’t any different than the others that affect us every years.
This has been an amazing victory for Trump and the general population on
social medias, whom exposed together the pathological lies of the
official communication channels of every New World Order country. De
facto, the credibility’s of these puppet governments have vanished in
the air, and from the eye of the storm, Italy will surely exit the EU
right after the crisis, which will trigger a domino effect running
through every EU countries and NATO members. My friends, globalism is
dead and ready for cremation.
Digging the abyss
International bankers couldn’t see
it coming in 1991, when they dominated 95% of the planet after the fall
of the Soviet Union. It seemed that nothing could halt their ultimate
mission to complete their Orwellian dream: destroy a few countries in
the Middle East, enlarge Israel, and get the total control over the
world oil market, the last piece of their Xanadu puzzle that they’ve
been working on for a whole century, starting with the Balfour
declaration in 1917.
When Vladimir Putin got charge of
Russia, there was no sign that he would do better than the drunk he had
replaced. An ex KGB officer seemed like a choice more driven by
nostalgia rather than ideology, but Putin had many more assets going for
him than first met the eyes: patriotism, humanism, a sense of justice,
cunning ruse, a genius economist friend named Sergey Glazyev whom openly
despised the New World Order, but above all, he embodied the
reincarnation of the long lost Russian ideology of total political and
economical independence. After a few years spent at draining the Russian
swamp from the oligarchs and mafiosis that his stumbling predecessor
had left in his trail of empty bottles, Vlad rolled his sleeves and got
to work.
Because his opponents had been
looting the planet for 250 years through colonization insured by a
military dominance, Vlad knew that he had to start by building an
invincible military machine. And he did. He came up with different types
of hypersonic missiles that can’t be stopped, the best defensive
systems on the planet, the best electronic jamming systems, and the best
planes. Then to make sure that a nuclear war wouldn’t be an option, he
came up with stuff which nightmares are made of, such as the Sarmat, the
Poseidon and the Avangard, all unstoppable and able to destroy any
country in a matter of a few hours.
Russian President Vladimir Putin, center, gestures while speaking during an annual meeting with top military officials in the National Defense Control Center in Moscow, December 24, 2019. Putin said that Russia is the only country in the world that has hypersonic weapons even though its military spending is a fraction of the U.S. military budget. Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, left, and Chief of General Staff of Russia Valery Gerasimov, right, attend the meeting.
With a new and unmatched arsenal,
he could proceed to defeat any NATO force or any of its proxies, as he
did starting in September 2015 in Syria. He proved to every country that
independence from the NWO banking system was now a matter of choice.
Putin not only won the Syrian war, but he won the support of many New
World Order countries that suddenly switched sides upon realizing how
invincible Russia had become. On a diplomatic level, it also got mighty
China by its side, and then managed to protect independent oil producers
such as Venezuela and Iran, while leaders like Erdogan of Turkey and
Muhammad Ben Salman of Saudi Arabia decided to side with Russia, who
isn’t holding the best poker hand, but the whole deck of cards.
Ending in the conclusion that
Putin now controls the all-mighty oil market, the unavoidable energy
resource that lubricates economies and armies, while the banksters’ NATO
can only watch, without any means to get it back. With the unbelievable
results that Putin has been getting in the last five years, the New
World Order suddenly looks like a house of cards about to crumble. The
Empire of Banks has been terminally ill for five years, but it’s now on
morphine, barely realizing what’s going on.
Tragedy and hope
Since there is no hope in starting
WW3 which is lost in advance, the last banzai came out of the bushes in
the shape of a virus and the ensuing media creation of a fake pandemic.
The main focus was to avoid a catastrophic hyperinflation of the
humongous mass of US dollar that no one wants anymore, to have time to
implement their virtual world crypto-currency, as if the chronically
failing bankers still have any legitimacy to keep controlling our money
supplies. It seemed at first that the plan could work. That’s when Vlad
took out his revolver to start the Russian roulette game and bankers
blew their brains out upon the pressure on the trigger.
He called a meeting with OPEP and
killed the price of oil by refusing to lower Russia’s production, taking
the barrel to under 30 dollars. Without any afterthought and certainly
even less remorse, Vlad killed the costly Western oil production. All
the dollars that had been taken out of the market had to be re-injected
by the Fed and other central banks to avoid a downslide and the final
disaster. By now, our dear bankers are out of solutions.
In the meantime, Trump also poked
at the tie-wearing gangsters. While medias avoided the corona-killing
chloroquine subject, an old pill designed to cure malaria, Trump imposed
to the FDA the use of this life-saving drug on US infected patients.
Medias didn’t have any choice but to start talking about it, which
ignited a chain reaction: big pharmas CEO’s were fired because they had
just lost the vaccine contract, countries like Canada looked like
genocidal fools for not using the cheap and inoffensive medication,
while a most outrageous criminal act by a government was exposed in full
light: the Macron government had proclaimed in January 2020 that
chloroquine was harmful and had restrained its use, just a couple of
weeks before the burst of the fake pandemic! Russian roulette is a
popular game in Western governments these days around.
On Saturday March 28th, Russia
announced its own corona-killing brew, based on Dr Raoult’s magic
potion. Yet another Cossack blow, this time to the big pharmas jugular
vein, while most Western countries now have to implement the good
doctor’s treatment, or face the slap of a Russian pill coming to save
its citizen. Putin is in the lifesaving business these days: in the last
week of March, he sent 15 military planes filled with doctors and
supplies directly to North Italy, after an aid plane from China was
blocked by the Czech Republic. We’re about to learn that European
countries fear that China or Russia finds the truth in the Lombardy
region, where people are not dying from some corona bug, but probably
from a deadly cocktail hybrid from two earlier vaccines for meningitis
and influenza, that they were injected in separate vaccination
campaigns.
The punchline
I said earlier that everyday
brings amazing news. Well on Sunday March 29th, the most stunning of
them all fell like a ton of bricks on social medias: confined onlookers
learned that Trump had taken control over the Federal Reserve, that is
now handled by two representatives of the Treasury of State. Of all the
crazy news within the last month, this is by far the best and most
shocking. After three years in power, Trump has finally fulfilled his
electoral promise of taking private banks out of the US public affairs,
ending a century of exploitation of the American citizens. He has put
the infamous Blackrock investment group to start buying important
corporations for the Fed, meaning that he’s nationalizing chunks of the
economy, while avoiding the crash of the market by implicating important
private investors in the deal.
President Donald Trump gestures with Jerome Powell, his nominee to become chairman of the U.S. Federal Reserve at the White House in Washington, U.S., November 2, 2017
This outmost daring move comes at a
crucial point in time, and faces us with the realization that Vladimir
Putin and Donald Trump are united and have taken humanity to the
crossroads of the New World Order and freedom. As I have stated often
before, I thought that the world would deeply change between 2020 and
2024, because these would be the last 4 years of these two heroes in
political power of their nations.
The New World Order is facing the
two most powerful countries on the planet, and this fake pandemic
changed everything. It showed how desperate the banksters are, and if we
don’t want to end up with nuclear warheads flying in both directions,
Putin and Trump have to stop them now.
Terminate the BIS, the World Bank,
the IMF, the European Central bank, the EU, NATO, now. Our world won’t
be perfect, but it might get much better soon.
Easter resurrection is coming. This might get biblical.
I
had today a stopover at a small provincial town in Northern Finland.
They were having their annual fair. After having enjoyed a fantastic
street stall portion of crispy fried vendace, I strolled around. I then
spotted the official Finnish protestant state church (yep, no separation
of state and church here) had their stall there, too. That prompted me
to ask a question, I long had in mind.
I approached the
representatives of the church and asked why the Finnish state church had
engaged in a propaganda campaign to support the jihadist terrorists of
Aleppo. From 12th to 24th of October 2016 the Finnish churches were
every day ringing their church bells “in support of the victims of
Aleppo bombings” by the Russian and Syrian forces. I asked those people
whether they knew that it was all the other way around and that the
Russians and Syrian government forces were liberating the people of
Aleppo from the brutal rule of the US sponsored terrorists. – They did
not know it.
“The church is engaged in various campaigns from
time to time,” I was told. – That I know, I said, and added that the
most recent campaign was that of being the official sponsor of the
Helsinki Pride sodomite pervert parade. ‘The church wants to live with
the times,” the young church official replied, and continued “that’s why
the church went in there as a business partner of the pride march.” –
BUSINESS PARTNER, I exclaimed. How can the church possibly be a business
partner of anything. What kind of business is this church engaged in?!?
“The church changes with the times,” my interlocutor said as three fat
women colleagues looked on. I was mighty surprised to hear that. I said,
how can the church which supposedly bases its faith in God’s immutable
words change. Are you then saying that the bible isn’t for real? And do
you mean the church was lying 100 years ago, or 50 years ago, when it
professed another opinion on sodomy? Or are you lying today? Which way
do you want to have it, I inquired?
I continued that line of
discussion and then eventually left with the note that I was happy that
so many people are leaving that fake politicized church. Membership used
to be some 90% of the population when I was young, and now it is down
to 60% and sinking.
I am not against sex in any consensual form
between willing adults performed in privacy, but I am against this NWO
globalist campaign of public perversion aimed at breaking down the
fabric of society by means of this devilish campaign.
This
perversion and its sister gender hoax is right up there with the climate
hoax as key means of the globalists to destroy family and national
values in order to break down society and make people more malleable for
one world government rule. Naturally, the population replacement
program by means of mass migration serves the same cause.
Russian President has slammed European leaders for allowing immigrants to “kill, plunder and rape” with impunity.
In an interview with the Financial Times
just ahead of the G20 summit, the Russian leader slammed Western
leaders’ attempt to destroy ‘traditional family values’ and warned that
liberalism was dying: “[Liberals] cannot simply dictate anything to anyone,” Mr Putin told the newspaper.
Putin added that liberalism conflicted with “the interests of the overwhelming majority of the population,” and criticized Chancellor Angela Merkel for allowing millions of refugees to spill into Germany in 2017.
“This liberal idea presupposes that nothing needs to be done.
That migrants can kill, plunder and rape with impunity because their
rights as migrants have to be protected.”
Dailymail.co.uk
reports: He added: ‘Every crime must have its punishment. The liberal
idea has become obsolete. It has come into conflict with the interests
of the overwhelming majority of the population.’
The G20 – the countries with the largest and fastest-growing
economies – are meeting in Osaka, Japan today and tomorrow and posed for
the famous ‘family photo’ of world leaders, including Britain’s Theresa
May, China’s Xi Jinping, Saudi Arabia’s Crown Prince Salman and their
host, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.
The leaders of the G20 meet in Osaka, Japan.
The first major meeting was between Donald Trump and the Russia’s
leader where the US President hailed their ‘very, very good
relationship’ with Russia’s leader, adding: ‘It’s a great honour to be
with President Putin’.
An extraordinary moment then followed their handshake as Trump told
Putin: ‘Don’t meddle in the election, please,’ with a smile on his face,
turning to grin at the Russian leader.
In sharp contrast, Mr Putin faced a far frostier head-to-head with a
grim-faced Theresa May as the two shook hands this morning. The Prime
Minister is due to demand he takes responsibility for the nerve agent
poisoning of Sergei Skripal in Salisbury last year and tell him to hand
over the Novichok assassins sent by the Russian state to kill their
former agent.
Outgoing
British Prime Minister Theresa May looks miserable as she poses for
photo standing next to Russian President Vladimir Putin
Mr Putin has reserved special praise for Donald Trump for trying to
stem the flow of migrants and drugs into the US, just before the men met
today.
Vladimir Putin today said British claims that his agents carried
out the Salisbury poisoning are ‘not worth five pounds’ – but justified
attacks on Russian traitors saying: ‘Treason is the gravest crime
possible and must be punished’.
The Russian President will meet Theresa May at the G20 in Russia
today where the Prime Minister will demand he admits to the Novichok
attack and hand over the two spies sent to kill Sergei Skripal last
year.
Mrs May has said her decision to speak to Putin in Osaka is not a
return to ‘business as usual’ with Russia, whose leader today sought to
laugh off claims he ordered the poisoning.
Mr Putin told the Financial Times: ‘Listen, all this fuss about spies
and counterspies, it is not worth serious interstate relations. This
spy story, as we say, it is not worth five kopecks. Or even five pounds,
for that matter’.
But in a chilling admission about how he believes his country should
‘punish’ like Skripal, who was secretly sharing secrets with the
British, he added: ‘Treason is the gravest crime possible and traitors
must be punished. I am not saying that the Salisbury incident is the way
to do it. But traitors must be punished.’
And in admission that he is willing to take risks to protect his
country, he said: ‘He who doesn’t take risks, never drinks Champagne’.
Earlier Putin said Anglo-Russian relations were beginning to improve
ahead of his face-to-face meeting with Theresa May at this weekend’s G20
summit in Osaka, Japan.
Relations have been rocky since the UK pointed the finger at the
Kremlin for the attempted assassination of former Russian spy Sergei
Skripal and his daughter Yulia in Salisbury in March last year.
Mr Putin said: ‘I think Russia and UK are both interested in fully
restoring our relations, at least I hope a few preliminary steps will be
made.’
But in a chilling admission about how he believes his country should
‘punish’ people like Skripal, who was secretly sharing secrets with the
British, he added: ‘Treason is the gravest crime possible and traitors
must be punished. I am not saying that the Salisbury incident is the way
to do it. But traitors must be punished.’
And in admission that he is willing to take risks to protect his
country, he said: ‘He who doesn’t take risks, never drinks Champagne’.
Trump’s critics have accused him of being too friendly with Putin and
castigated him for failing to publicly confront the Russian leader in
Helsinki over Moscow’s meddling in the 2016 presidential election.
A U.S. special counsel, Robert Mueller, conducted a two-year
investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election and
whether the Trump campaign colluded with Moscow.
Mueller found that Russia did meddle in the election but that the
Trump campaign did not illegally conspire with Russia to influence the
vote.
In a further attempt to lighten the mood, Trump sought common ground
with Putin at the expense of the journalists who had gathered to catch
the leaders at the outset of their meeting.
President Donald Trump said it was an ‘honor’ to be meeting with the Russian leader
‘Get rid of them. Fake news is a great term, isn’t it. You don’t have this problem in Russia but we do,’ Trump said.
World leaders kicked off one of their most high-stakes G20 meetings
in years Friday, with rows brewing over a bruising US-China trade war
and climate change despite a more conciliatory tone from US President
Donald Trump.
After lashing out at friend and foe alike en route to Osaka in
western Japan for the meeting, Trump appeared in a less combative mood
when meeting fellow world leaders face-to-face.
Fresh from describing traditionally close US ally Germany as
‘delinquent’ for not paying enough into the NATO budget, he was effusive
when meeting Chancellor Angela Merkel.
‘She’s a fantastic person, a fantastic woman and I’m glad to have her as a friend,’ he said.
A Sundance documentary ostensibly about the 1961 plane crash which killed then UN Secretary-General, Dag Hammarskjold, contains explosive claims of a conspiracy to spread HIV among South Africa’s black population.
Directed by controversial Danish journalist, filmmaker, and provocateur Mads Brügger, ‘Cold Case Hammarskjold,’ debuted Saturday at the Sundance Film Festival.
It details an investigation into the largely unsolved death of Swedish diplomat and former UN Secretary-General Dag Hammarskjold, whose DC-6 plane crashed near Ndola, Northern Rhodesia (modern Zambia). Initial investigations identified the cause as pilot error or mere mechanical fault, though doubts have persisted in the 50+ years since the crash.
Throughout the course of the new documentary, Brügger and his team investigate a white militia, the South African Institute for Maritime Research (SAIMR). According to documents the filmmakers uncovered, the group operated with support from the CIA and British Intelligence and orchestrated the 1961 plane crash which killed Hammarskjold. The documentarians eventually encounter and interview a man named Alexander Jones who is allegedly a former member of the group.
Jones, who is not related to Alex Jones of InfoWars, claims the mercenary group used phony vaccinations to spread HIV with a view to wiping out the black population of South Africa, in addition to carrying out the Hammarskjold assassination.
“We were at war,” Jones says, as cited by The New York Times. “Black people in South Africa were the enemy.”
However, medical experts have already dismissed Jones’ claims as medically dubious and unscientific in the extreme.
“The probability that they were able to do this is close to zero,” said Dr. Salim S Abdool Karim, the director of Caprisa, an AIDS research center in South Africa, citing the immense resources that would be required to conduct such a far-fetched attempt at genocide.
Notwithstanding the technological limitations of the 1990s, including facilities to rival that of the Centers for disease control and prevention in the US in addition to millions of dollars in funding, HIV is extraordinarily difficult to isolate, transport and grow in a laboratory environment, let alone distribute en masse in a clandestine operation, Dr Abdool explains.
However, Jones claims he visited a research facility in the 1990s that was used for “for sinister experimentation” and that he was certain its intent was "to eradicate black people.”
Many have criticized the filmmakers for helping to sow distrust of the medical establishment in a country that already has one of the highest HIV infection rates in the world while reviving dangerous conspiracy theories that have persisted since the Cold War.
The filmmaker, who has previously been described as a 'fabulist' and 'provocateur', according to the Hollywood Reporter, admits he has been unable to corroborate Jones' ever-evolving story; As the documentary makers continued to question Jones, his accounts became more and more dubious as he professed firsthand knowledge of people that had seemingly been brought to his attention by the documentarians themselves.
Rich Democratic
donors, including George Soros, have thrown their weight behind super
PACs' effort to lambast Donald Trump's handling of the COVID-19
outbreak. Vladimir Golstein, associate professor at Rhode Island's Brown
University, foresees that the Dems will try to "milk" the crisis until
November in order to undermine Trump's re-election bid.
On Monday, CNN reported
that Priorities USA Action, the largest Democratic Party super PAC, is
launching a $6 million ad campaign slamming President Donald Trump for
his response to the coronavirus pandemic. Meanwhile, another Dem super
PAC, PACRONYM, announced a similar campaign on 17 March, vowing to spend
$5 million on it, according to The Washington Post.
For its part, The Washington Free Beaconnotes
that it is just a small portion of funds allocated by wealthy liberal
donors, including George Soros, to "weaken" Trump. The media outlet
highlights that this year Soros has already funneled
$5 million to Priorities USA Action through his Democracy PAC which was
created in July 2019 to serve as a hub for his 2020 race spending. For
comparison's sake PACRONYM reportedly received just $250,000 from the Hungarian-born billionaire last year.
In February, the Democrats decided to shift from their impeachment failure to a new campaign targeting Trump's potential economic setbacks, according
to Politico. At the time, the media outlet explained that while the
Democratic camp had begun "to aggressively go after Trump’s track record
on the economy" it couldn't decide "exactly how to message it". The
coronavirus-driven recession has come in handy for them, according to
Vladimir Golstein, associate professor at Brown University in Rhode
Island.
Sputnik: What's your take on the Dems' recent anti-Trump
effort? Is it politically correct to capitalise on the American people's
fears amid the pandemic? Does the end justify the means in this case?
Vladimir Golstein: Democrats are doing the best they
can to utilise this crisis in order to “soften” their target: President
Trump. While the future of Trump is not certain, the current crisis has
already had its first serious political victim: Senator Sanders, whose
fall in the primaries was as spectacular as his rise just before the
crisis began to unfold. Due to the restrictions on public gatherings,
due to the general panic, and consistent drumbeat from Democratic
leadership that, first, former Vice President Biden is a figure of
stability and unity, and that, second, Senator Sanders is both too
radical and too weak to beat Trump, Sanders began to lose dramatically.
Encouraged by their success with Sanders, the Democratic leadership
clearly used fear-mongering to present the current medical crisis as the
result of Trump’s profound inadequacies. Had all these events unfolded
in the fall, Trump would have sunk as quickly as did Sanders, paving the way for Biden straight into White House.
The timing, however, proved somewhat
premature. Consequently, Democrats intend to milk the crisis all the way
to November. Thus, their persistent demands that the whole country
comes to a standstill. All this presented as the desire to safe lives by
quarantining the whole population, but the motives behind the
scare-tactics are obvious.
Conversely, Trump originally erred on the other side, trying to
diminish the dangers of the infection. Needless to say, Democrats
immediately denounced Trump’s political motives, while keeping silent
about their own. Now the issue has been expanded from the medical
dimension into economics. The situation appears rather dire, millions
apply for unemployment, the market sinks, and general gloom prevails.
Trump’s attempts to get the economy back on track are greeted with
condemnations and accusations of cruelty. Yet, it is clear, what is
driving the Democrat Party's righteous anger.
An interesting situation emerges: while the educated and liberal
class that does its job via computers, want the current quarantine to
continue, since its loss of income is insignificant, Trump’s traditional
supporters: both rich owners of various enterprises, and their
blue-collar workers, want to get back to work. So as usual, economics
will decide everything.
Sputnik: Is it ethical, in your view, to spend millions on
anti-Trump political ads amid the coronavirus outbreak, instead of, for
example, supporting those in need?
Vladimir Golstein: As they say, “all fair in love
and war", and there is no doubt that Democrats view Trump as their
enemy. It is naïve to expect political parties to abstain from
politicking. Where Democrats seem to have miscalculated, however, is in
the power and decisiveness of Trump. As the president of the most
powerful and wealthy country in the world, he has endless means at his
disposal. I am sure that he’ll do everything he can to get the economy
back on track, and to solve the medical crisis before the summer ends.
In my estimation, Democrats will come to regret their decision to sink
Sanders – the only candidate who could have unseated Trump in November.
Sputnik: What do you think about the US liberal MSM coverage of Donald Trump's handling of the crisis?
Vladimir Golstein: I try to avoid mass media in the
United States, since it is so politicised that it is not worth the
effort to read through endless barbs and accusations. However, just a
brief look at the articles carried by liberal publications, such as the
Huffington Post, for example, conveys just one message: Trump is not
qualified, Trump is not ready, Trump is dangerous, Trump is wrong.
Fox News is the only cable news network to cover President Donald Trump's signing of the $2.2 trillion coronavirus stimulus bill
CNN and MSNBC are refusing to air his remarks where he describes what his administration has done to help American families and the economy pic.twitter.com/w4JkzebKLl
Needless to say, all these innuendos are given under the pretext of covering the COVID-19 news, and therefore accompanied by the pictures of hospital doctors, suffering patients, and so on. This is a typical title: "I'm An ER Doctor In NYC. Trump's Coronavirus Plan Isn't Just Dangerous, It's Deadly".
Such Fake reporting by the @nytimes, @washingtonpost, @CNN & others. They use a small portion of a sentence out of a full paragraph in order to demean. They really are corrupt and disgusting. No wonder the media is, according to polls, record setting low & untrusted. #MAGA
There is no doubt that Trump’s handling of the crisis, and on a more
serious level, his handling of the public investment in hospitals and
medicine, has been inadequate. But the same can be said about his
critics, the Democratic leadership, that did the best they could to
neutralise Bernie Sanders, even though he was one of the few candidates
who consistently arguing for the overhaul of the medical system. So the
criticism of Democrats, who constantly vote to give billions to military
and nothing for medicine, seems to be highly disingenuous and
opportunistic.
The virus is a serious issue in
itself, and even more serious in what it tells us about the bankruptcy
of neoliberalism, and the collapse of the post-Cold War world order. We
need some professionals writing about the former, and some thoughtful
economists to write about the latter when dust settles. What we don't
need is the highly partisan mass media, which uses any opportunity to
report on the coronavirus to blame Trump for his failures, greed, and
corruption.
The views and opinions expressed in the article do not necessarily reflect those of Sputnik.
Liberteon